首页> 外文OA文献 >Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT
【2h】

Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT

机译:混合迭代重建对Agatston冠状动脉钙分数的影响与天然心脏CT滤过背向投射的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE\ud\udTo investigate whether the effects of hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) on coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurements using the Agatston score lead to changes in assignment of patients to cardiovascular risk groups compared to filtered back projection (FBP).\ud\udMATERIALS AND METHODS\ud\ud68 patients (mean age 61.5 years; 48 male; 20 female) underwent prospectively ECG-gated, non-enhanced, cardiac 256-MSCT for coronary calcium scoring. Scanning parameters were as follows: Tube voltage, 120 kV; Mean tube current time-product 63.67 mAs (50 - 150 mAs); collimation, 2 × 128 × 0.625 mm. Images were reconstructed with FBP and with HIR at all levels (L1 to L7). Two independent readers measured Agatston scores of all reconstructions and assigned patients to cardiovascular risk groups. Scores of HIR and FBP reconstructions were correlated (Spearman). Interobserver agreement and variability was assessed with ĸ-statistics and Bland-Altmann-Plots.\ud\udRESULTS\ud\udAgatston scores of HIR reconstructions were closely correlated with FBP reconstructions (L1, R = 0.9996; L2, R = 0.9995; L3, R = 0.9991; L4, R = 0.986; L5, R = 0.9986; L6, R = 0.9987; and L7, R = 0.9986). In comparison to FBP, HIR led to reduced Agatston scores between 97 % (L1) and 87.4 % (L7) of the FBP values. Using HIR iterations L1 - L3, all patients were assigned to identical risk groups as after FPB reconstruction. In 5.4 % of patients the risk group after HIR with the maximum iteration level was different from the group after FBP reconstruction.\ud\udCONCLUSION\ud\udThere was an excellent correlation of Agatston scores after HIR and FBP with identical risk group assignment at levels 1 - 3 for all patients. Hence it appears that the application of HIR in routine calcium scoring does not entail any disadvantages. Thus, future studies are needed to demonstrate whether HIR is a reliable method for reducing radiation dose in coronary calcium scoring.
机译:目的\ ud \ ud研究使用Agatston评分对混合迭代重建(HIR)对冠状动脉钙(CAC)测量的影响是否导致患者被归入心血管风险组,而不是过滤后背投影(FBP)。 \ ud材料与方法\ ud \ ud68例患者(平均年龄61.5岁;男48例;女20例)接受了前瞻性ECG门控,非增强型心脏256-MSCT冠状动脉钙化评分。扫描参数如下:管电压120kV;平均管电流时间乘积63.67 mAs(50-150 mAs);准直,2×128×0.625 mm。使用FBP和HIR在所有级别(L1至L7)重建图像。两名独立的读者测量了所有重建手术的Agatston评分,并将患者分配到了心血管风险组。 HIR和FBP重建的分数相关(Spearman)。观察者之间的一致性和变异性通过ĸ统计和Bland-Altmann-Plots进行评估。\ ud \ udRESULTS \ ud \ udAgatston评分与HIR重建与FBP重建密切相关(L1,R = 0.9996; L2,R = 0.9995; L3, R 1 = 0.9991; L 4,R 5 = 0.986; L 5,R 5 = 0.9986; L 6,R 5 = 0.9987;和L 7,R 5 = 0.9986)。与FBP相比,HIR导致Agatston得分降低了FBP值的97%(L1)至87.4%(L7)。使用HIR迭代L1-L3,将所有患者分配为与FPB重建后相同的风险组。在5.4%的患者中,具有最大迭代水平的HIR后风险组与重建FBP后的组不同。\ ud \ ud结论\ ud \ ud HIR和FBP后的Agatston评分与相同风险组分配水平之间具有极好的相关性所有患者为1-3。因此,似乎在常规钙评分中应用HIR不会带来任何不利影响。因此,需要进一步的研究来证明HIR是否是降低冠状动脉钙化评分中辐射剂量的可靠方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号